Moving on to the far more popular and economically priced (it’s free!) 7-Zip, the Rypops back to the front of the line, but not by a huge amount for a CPU that has two more cores. WinRAR has never favored the mesh-style Infinity Fabric in Ryzen, nor the similar technology in Intel’s Skylake-X. We’ve long suspected that it doesn’t like Ryzen’s Infinity Fabric or other mesh designs, because it also runs slower on Intel’s mesh-design Skylake X CPUs than it does on the mesh-free Broadwell-E Intel CPUs. To be fair, the multi-threaded benchmark in WinRAR has never really loved Ryzen. Overall, we give the Rythe nod for 3D modeling tasks, but the story changes for our next category. Based on a older rendering engine from Cinema 4D, the benchmark generally favors more cores than clock speed. But like Blender, sometimes the higher clock speed, or perhaps the design of the Core i9, just works better with it.Ĭinebench puts the Ryahead of the Core i9-but not by much. Our last rendering test is the ever-popular Cinebench R15. As Blender shows, clock speeds can help sometimes, even in multi-threaded loads.ĭespite having two more cores, the Ryzen 7 2700’s win isn’t quite as spectacular in Blender. When overclocked, the Core i9 gets so close you can call it a tie. Rywins, but the margin is thinner despite having two more physical cores. Like most 3D modeling apps, it favors more cores and more threads. Blender is an open source 3D modeling application popular with many indie movies. Like V-Ray, the unbiased photorealistic Corona renderer prefers more cores to higher clock speeds.Ĭore i9 finds its footing in another rendering test. Again, the Ryzen’s 16 threads > Core i9’s 12 threads, and the AMD Ryzen 7 pulls out a very decent win against the Intel Core i9. “Unbiased” refers not to its CPU preference, but rather to the lighting model it uses. Corona is an “unbiased photorealistic renderer” that works in 3ds Max. We see a repeat in the Corona rendering benchmark. It’s a big win for AMD’s 8-core Ryagainst the 6-core Core i9-8950HK. AMD takes a big win here against Intel’s most powerful Core i9 CPU. What you see below is simple math: The Ryzen 7 2700’s 8 cores > the Core i9-8950HK’s 6 cores. In fact, it’s almost too quite and made us wonder if more performance tuning might be warranted. The AMD version is among the quietest gaming laptops we’ve heard in a long time. We expected the Radeon and Ryzen combo to sing all the time, but instead, it was the Core i9 and GeForce that droned on forever. Except for what appears to be large heat sink on the AMD laptop, the rest appears to be the same.Īfter testing both systems, one unexpected surprise was the fan noise. So yes, they’re about as close as you can get.Īcer’s Predator Helios 500, the version with AMD Ryand Radeon Vega 56 on the left, and the version with Intel Core i9-8950HK and GeForce GTX 1070 on the right. In fact, we successfully removed the bottom cover from the Intel/Nvidia version, and snapped it in place on the AMD version. The two laptops basically appear to be the same except for the motherboard, CPU and GPU. That’s just odd and makes the extra $300 for the Intel and Nvidia laptop seem well worth it. Display: 144Hz, 1080p IPS screen with AMD’s FreeSync.Ī note about the AMD version’s skimpy storage: There is a free M.2 slot and a free 2.5-inch bay-but there’s no connector for the drive.Graphics: Radeon RX Vega 56 graphics card with 8GB of HBM2 memory.RAM: 16GB of DDR4/2400 with two free SO-DIMM slots.In both cases, a panel with 1080p resolution and a refresh rate of 144 Hz is available. The Intel + Nvidia option will include a G-Sync module, while the AMD version will come with FreeSync, so the latter should be cheaper. This will make it the first top-of-the-range laptop with 100% AMD hardware for years to come. So, the Acer Predator Helios 500 will come in two variants with Intel i9-8950HK + NVIDIA GTX 1070 and AMD Ry+ AMD Radeon RX Vega 56. It is to be expected that this Radeon RX Vega 56 will come underclocked to reduce its power consumption, and thus the amount of heat generated, which would make its performance lower than the GeForce GTX 1070 even more consuming. Nvidia’s proposal has a TDP of 120W, while AMD’s Vega 56 has a TDP of no less than 210W, a large amount of heat generated in a very small space, which poses an engineering challenge. Both cards perform very similarly, but with an important difference. It has taken a long time for a brave man to dare to put an AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 into a laptop, the Acer Predator Helios 500, whose familiar version is a GeForce GTX 1070. Acer Predator Helios 500 has a version with Radeon RX Vega 56
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |